Coming Home The ingress of Saturn into a new sign is always important, but there is no ingress into any of the 12 signs as inherently meaningful as the entrance into Capricorn. This is because Capricorn is ruled by Saturn, meaning that the sign receives the planet as its rightful lord and master. Any planet in a sign which it rules, such as Mars in Aries or Jupiter in Sagittarius, has its core significations strengthened. A planet in a sign which it rules is like a king or queen in their own castle.
He was not interested in publishing negative book reviews. In place of "the scathing takedown rip," Fitzgerald said, he desired to promote a positive community experience. A community, even one dedicated to positivity, needs an enemy to define itself against.
Upworthy, the next iteration, has gone ahead and made its name out of the premise. There is more at work here than mere good feelings. There is a consensus, or something that has assumed the tone of a consensus, that we are living, to our disadvantage, in an age of snark—that the problem of our times is a thing called "snark.
In her essay, Julavits was grappling with the question of negative book reviewing: Was it fair or necessary?
Was the meanness displayed in book reviews a symptom of deeper failings in the culture? The decade that followed did little to clear up the trouble; if anything, the identification of "snark" gave people a way to avoid thinking very hard about it.
Snark is supposed to be self-evidently and self-explanatorily bad: I bought the Denby book used for six bucks, to cut him out of the loop on any royalties.
But why are nastiness and snideness taken to be features of our age? One general point of agreement, in denunciations of snark, is that snark is reactive.
It is a kind of response. Yet to what is it responding? Of what is it contemptuous? Stand against snark, and you are standing with everything decent. Over time, it has become clear that anti-negativity is a worldview of its own, a particular mode of thinking and argument, no matter how evasively or vapidly it chooses to express itself.
It is scolding, couched as an appeal to goodness, in the name of an absent authority.
The same maxim—minus the Disney citation and tidied up to "anything at all"—was offered by an organization called PRConsulting Group recently, in support of its announcement that the third Tuesday in October would be " Snark-Free Day.
Are the goals of the public-relations profession the goals of the world in general? Why does a publicist talk like a book reviewer?
If you listen to the crusaders against negativity—in literature, in journalism, in politics, in commerce—you begin to hear a recurring set of themes and attitudes, amounting to an omnipresent, unnamed cultural force. The words flung outward start to define a sort of unarticulated philosophy, one that has largely avoided being recognized and defined.
Without identifying and comprehending what they have in common, we have a dangerously incomplete understanding of the conditions we are living under. They send links to articles, essays, Tumblr posts, online comments, tweets—the shared attitude transcending any platform or format or subject matter.
What is this defining feature of our times? What is snark reacting to? It is reacting to smarm. What is smarm, exactly? Smarm is a kind of performance—an assumption of the forms of seriousness, of virtue, of constructiveness, without the substance.
Smarm is concerned with appropriateness and with tone. Smarm would rather talk about anything other than smarm. If there is a defining document of contemporary literary smarm, it is an interview Eggers did via email with the Harvard Advocate inin which a college student had the poor manners to ask the literary celebrity about " selling out.
Do not be critics, you people, I beg you. I was a critic and I wish I could take it all back because it came from a smelly and ignorant place in me, and spoke with a voice that was all rage and envy.
Do not dismiss a book until you have written one, and do not dismiss a movie until you have made one, and do not dismiss a person until you have met them. Here we have the major themes or attitudes of smarm: Eggers used to be a critic, but he has grown out of childish things.
Eggers has done the work—the book publishing, the Hollywood deal-making—that makes his opinions unlike those of his audience earned and valid opinions. It is no accident that he is addressing undergraduates here; he tells the Advocate that before he sent back his reply to its questions, he had already delivered a version of the text as a speech at Yale.April , rev.
April (This article is derived from a talk given at the Franz Developer Symposium.) In the summer of , my friend Robert Morris and I started a startup called rutadeltambor.com plan was to write software .
Turning Interviews into First-Person Essays Interviews are a wonderful tool for documenting history and social or cultural issues, and also a great way to learn about people’s lives.
The figure seems about right.
From the Wall Street Journal article Fast-Paced Best Seller: Author Russell Blake Thrives on Volumes “In , self-published books accounted for 32% of the top selling e-books on Amazon each week, on average.”.
For obvious reasons, people will turn down the changes in life. show more content It’s depressing how this works, but it’s probably the most reason why people change.
It’s much like peer pressure which usually ends up in the wrong direction. Music, Film, TV and Political News Coverage.
In reply to the question, Eggers told the Advocate that yes, he was what people call a sellout, that he had been paid $12, for a single magazine article, that he had taken the chance to hang.